Thursday, September 10, 2009

Fall meetings

The fall meeting schedule is in full swing! One of the best ways (at least for me!) to figure out a brick wall is to talk to another genealogist, explain exactly what I want and what I've already tried, and listen to he/she tell me what I've overlooked! A slightly different perspective coming from someone with different experience often provides me with ideas I can pursue. And the best way to do that? Go to a conference, make some new friends, listen to the lectures for those new kernels or the old ones you forgot. Here's a couple major conferences for you to check out:

The Minnesota Genealogical Society conference is scheduled for Sept 18-19. More details are available on its website at http://mngs.org. There are classes on Friday afternoon, a banquet that evening and a full day on Saturday. You can attend parts or all, depending on your schedule. This one will be held in South St. Paul and features Claire Bettag (and she's a wonderful speaker)!

For those of you near Moorhead, you might want to consider the conference to be held held there on September 26, and described at http://survey.mnstate.edu/heritageed/index.php. They offer six (that's 6!) concurrent tracks, and if you can't find something to help with your problem, it's a real toughie. This is always one of my favorites, because of the diversity and scope of their program.

If those are too close in time for you to get there, consider the Southern Minnesota Conference October 24th on the campus of Mankato State University. Details are available at http://lib.mnsu.edu/archives/genie/expo.html. The full schedule and program are linked, with .PDFs. Looks like an excellent program, too!

And there are more, too, generally smaller in attendance. If you can't get to a conference, how about checking out a local genealogy group? Exchanging stories face to face is a good way to get motivated and looking at some new ideas!

Sunday, September 6, 2009

Cemetery research and compulsiveness

Many of the questions directed at me involve finding where an ancestor might be buried in Minnesota. "Where would my great-great-grandmother be buried?" While that may sound relatively simple, finding the right cemetery and analyzing all the available information can require dogged research. Lots of us are hooked on cemeteries, love to walk them looking for ancestors, and volunteer for them in some capacity. I've done it all!

Questions about cemetery record transcriptions came up as I was preparing the September 2009 issue of the Minnesota Genealogical Journal, I found some Quartermaster record books in the National Archives microfilm for Fort Snelling. (The September 2009 issue has an article about the cemetery there, and transcriptions of the records.) Fort Snelling was built circa 1820, in an extremely strategic location. It was built where what is now the Minnesota River from the western part of Minnesota pours into the Mississippi River. Years ago, far more than I want to admit, I checked out the burials where Rev. Ezekiel Gear officiated. Besides serving as chaplain at the fort, he also served settlers at Christ Church Episcopal, in St. Paul. That congregation had its own cemetery at the time. The cemetery became a part of what is now Oakland Cemetery, the oldest and largest non-denominational cemetery in St. Paul, founded in 1853.

I was Publications Chair for the Minnesota Genealogical Society, and we had a volunteer who offered to help put together records for Oakland Cemetery. Because I'm compulsive, especially when it comes to understanding the context of what I'm working on, I decided to look at both the records kept by the congregation and those kept at the fort while the early cemetery interment records were transcribed.

One might imagine that the records, at least for the Episcopalians, would match up. They didn't. I could understand that non-Episcopalians would be buried at the Fort or in other places. But during Gear's time as Army chaplain, there were some that showed up in only one of the three places, others that showed up in two, along with some that were in all three. All three sets were original records, kept at the time of death/burial, and yet there were differences!

That discovery, combined with my experience in Maine with multiple transcriptions for my husband's family, convinced me that it was very unlikely that I would ever be able to 'finish' my family research. There would always be more to do, more brick walls, etc. to accompany the never ending multiplication of ancestors. I realized that people make mistakes; people don't always follow through on what they are supposed to do; people misunderstand, misread, misidentify, and set those of us who follow up for chasing the wrong path. It's not intentional, but sometimes those little discrepancies among sources open up fascinating new possibilities.

My latest research note goes through some of the analysis steps for finding the right cemetery, and a couple of the available resources that can help. Sometimes, especially for family, old or abandoned cemeteries, a researcher is dependent on other people's transcriptions. Perhaps the only grave marker was made of wood. Even stones can be damaged or just wear away with time and not photo exists. Vandals can help that process along, too. Finding multiple transcriptions for the same burials was an eye-opener in my research process. More than anything else, it showed me the benefit of a friend's instruction: "Turn over every rock when doing your research. You never know what you may find." Compulsiveness can be good!